Uncategorized

I hear there’s something called “blogs…”

“I wonder what’s happening in Norwegian politics” is a question you haven’t been asking yourself lately. Even so, Espen here at Blog Campaigning wanted me to write something about it, and considering we’re in the run-up to the campaign season I figured I might as well take a look at how the internet is likely to be used in the campaign.

First of all, it seems that the guys and girls who work with communications at the different party offices have discovered there’s more to the internet than banners and websites.

No, not blogs. It seems that there’s still only a couple of members of parliament blogging, and other that that there’s only one or two who are in some kind of a position within their party who blog. My bet is that this will probably change as the campaign draws closer. There are a few reasons for this, but the main one is that Norway’s largest online newspaper, Verdens Gang (1,2 million online readers daily is quite impressive in a country of 4,5 million people) will offer all candidates in the forthcoming municipal elections their own blogs on the paper's website. Add to this the chance of actually making the (web) frontpage of Verdens Gang if you write something interesting enough, then that should be an incentive for a large number of candidates to sign up. This will of course also create a large number of unbelievably boring blogs which will be filled with pictures (indeed, pictures. high-tech, no?) of shoddy roads and endless rants about how we need to fill those potholes. And these blogs will of course be vastly more effective in generating attention than well-written ones that concern themselves with questions about the right of the majority to impose their will on the minority in a liberal democracy.

In Norway political advertising on TV is forbidden so online video has gained in popularity recently. Some of the youth parties have been using YouTube for a good while, but when Verdens Gang released their own video service, making videos available for a much wider audience (mainly because they put videos they deem interesting or newsworthy enough on their frontpage) it became genuinely worthwhile to use videos. First out was the Minister of International Development, Erik Solheim who released a video in which he talked about something. I just honestly can’t remember what because it was utterly boring. However it gave you a good idea of how most of these videos will look: camera aimed at someone talking for a couple of minutes. No cuts, no production, nothing. Especially the Labour Party has been effective at using videos. Lately the Conservative party has also gotten some attention around a few videos: Both done by talking directly at the camera.

Since I feel the need to honk my own horn I should point out that the Norwegian Young Conservatives have probably been the most efficient in using videos, both in terms of the number of videos that have been on the frontpage of Verdens Gang and how they look.

I’m also guessing that the Conservatives will get some attention if they only ever get around to using this one in an effective way. Videos will be important in the upcoming election I’m pretty certain.

Facebookmania is upon Norway . The media is involved in what seems to be an almost official competition about who can find the most creative way to do a story that involves Facebook (so far the award goes to the journalist who figured out that a famous attorney had friends). So far it remains to see how effectively it can be used in campaigns as a tool for organizing events, synchronizing messages etc, but for now it’s a very effective tool for getting attention from the media. Some have had to learn that being a member of a group that’s dedicated to hating a local phenomena is not a good way to get attention. Others have figured out that simply telling someone they’re running a campaign on Facebook is a way for the local newspaper to get to write about Facebook, for which they’re grateful. It remains to be seen if the hype will make it to the actual campaign period. I doubt it. But for now it’s a good way to get your name in the paper.

My guess is that these tools will be mostly used to get attention in the traditional media (including online news sources which should be considered traditional by now), not as independent campaign tools. In order for that to work they need something smart enough to go viral, and right now it certainly seems they’ll need outside help for that.

- Odd (yes, it is my real name!)

Jonathan Rick: Which Candidates Are Holding Conference Calls with Bloggers?

Jonathan Rick of No Straw Men is examining Which Candidates (Presidential) Are Holding Conference Calls with Bloggers?. His project (compiling a chart of which presidential candidates are holding conference calls with bloggers) is under development and is a collaborative process. If you happen to know anything about this, head to Rick’s blog and help him out! And while you are there, check out Rick’s chart of the Presidential candidates YouTube subscribers! Not surprisingly, it is Obama that has the most subscribers.

Footnote: Obama is again the candidate that has the most MySpace friends (71,759) according to TechPresident’s ‘MySpace Friends chart’.  

- Espen

Who dares to say that blogs do not have an impact on political campaigning?

A thought struck me after reading a media release from the Dodd for President Team over at Campaigns & Elections today: Will a contemporary campaign ever run a campaign again without saying this:  

"The Dodd for President campaign will continue to be on the cutting edge in its use of internet technology and outreach," said Dodd internet strategist Tim Tagaris. "Like his Kitchen Table Campaign, Chris Dodd's website reflects his belief in the importance of a direct conversation between voters and the campaign."

I don’t think so. So who dares to say that blogs do not have an impact on political campaigns?  

By the way, the statement was presented in a media release outlining Dodd’s “new and improved” website….which will “continue to stress the campaign's innovative internet strategies”…. The release also announces that the campaign has brought in experienced blogger Matt Browner-Hamlin to do blogger outreach and that the new website will include:

Twitter, a real-time blogging tool that will enable live updates from the field, delivering real-time updates to anyone interested in the campaign via the website, SMS and instant messanger technology; Ustream, a real-time streaming video and audio site that will allow anyone to join Senator Dodd on the campaign trail from the primary states; Social networking platforms, continuing to engage users of MySpace, Facebook and other sites as a means of internet outreach. 

The new site looks good, but it really doesn’t contain much information. But hey, I am used to Norwegian political websites, sites that offer no real opportunity for voters to interact with the politicians and only contain information about issues and policies; sites that are so closed and boring that I never ever pay them a visit!

- Espen

I-a be seein' you at the awards ceremony

Earlier this week, I was going to write a post about how I felt about the recent IABC Ovation Awards ceremony in Toronto, but it looks like the glamorous and gorgeous Julie Rusciolelli beat me to it. I’m new (well, newish) to Toronto, so I had never heard of a lot of the companies and people that won awards. I’m sure they did a great job, and its too bad that the IABC didn’t do a better job of designing the actual awards. I don’t think I was even eligible for an award, and for that I’m glad. Those purple, globular, glass things were ugly. To me, they certainly didn’t communicate “excellence.”*

One person who did communicate excellence was Scott MacDonald Scott Macdonald. He won the student award (sponsored, I believe, by Maverick PR). I met this guy a month or so ago at one of Joe Thornley’s Third Tuesday Meetings (again, great work on putting those together, Joe). He’s smart, a skilled writer, and a good conversationalist. Based on what I can tell, he also works pretty hard. And he won that award.

I’m fairly certain you can’t ask for much more.

Normally, the practice seems to be for young folks like him to call around, looking for ‘informational interviews’ at agencies in order to get a foot in the door of the PR industry. You know, ask questions, find out about the company, show that you've got a head on your shoulders in the hopes of getting a job. With Scott, I think the tables should be turned. You guys should be contacting him, trying to get him into one of your agencies. Take him out for lunch, buy him a drink, preorder business cards for him, whatever. Don’t miss out on this future Toronto PR star.

Oh, and his classes are over at the end of a summer, so he’ll be looking for an internship in September.

-Parker

UPDATE: Scott's URL is actually scottymac.wordpress.com. Sorry, Scott!

*Note: What are the awards like at the annual Award Makers' Awards? I bet that the categories are awesome and super self-referential: “Best Design For An Awards Show Not Including This One,” “People’s Choice Award for a Trophy Designed For This Show,” and so on.

Aggregation Aggravation

A little while ago, I read a post on Big Mike Seaton’s blog about Digital and Social Media Syndrome, and that got me thinking.I've got two Yahoo! e-mail accounts (business and pleasure), A Facebook account, a MySpace page, a YouTube account(whoa...I forgot that I even made those movies), a MyRagan account, a Meetup.com account, and now (thanks to Darren), a Dopplr account. Occassionally, I get e-mails from Friendster telling that I have an account there, but I can't remember my login name or password and haven't used it in years. At one point, I think I also had an account for Flickr.

I’m sure that this problem of login excess is something that we can all relate to. Is there no possible way to combine all of these so that I only have to log in once to check updates from every page? I’m not very familiar with Hotmail, so forgive me for using Yahoo! mail as an example I’m thinking that something like the Yahoo! mail interface would be great. Log in, and you can see a row of folders on the left hand side, each one for a different site. A little number in brackets would tell you how many new items/updates/messages you have for each account, and clicking on the folder would open up a tab in the main window. When composing a message, it would be possible to not only decide who to send it to, but to which one of their accounts, and in what manner (private message, wall post, photo comment, etc.).

I know I wrote about this before here, but I've been thinking about it a lot lately. A hell of a lot.

I’ve thought this through. All I need now is a team of coders and some cash.

-Parker

Dome Nation: John Kerry talks about blogging, YouTube and his passion for Harley Davidson!

TechPresident’s David All and Mydd’s Jerome Armstrong have started a new YouTube channel called DomeNation, which takes viewers inside the modern world of tech and politics. Their second video features John Kerry reflecting on his work with, and outreach to, bloggers, which are (according to Kerry) the new medium, and the new way of communicating with the people.

If you have nothing to do for the next 8 minutes I strongly advise you to watch the video. This video is good stuff!

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyoynpCCKZI]

American Princess: Can a Presidential campaign run a Myspace page effectively?

There have been plenty of writings about the Obama campaign’s experiences with MySpace lately. Today I found (via TBR) a ‘straight from the heart’ comment questioning whether it is possible for Presidential campaigns to run a MySpace, or other voter-generated sites for that reason, effectively.

In an excellent post in American Princess, E. M. Zanotti writes:

The big mistake comes in thinking that a Presidential campaign can run a MySpace page effectively. Suddenly, everyones inboxes will be full of carefully crafted press statements about appropriations, floor votes, positions on tax reform, and the ever popular "referrals to the Ways and Means committees." For hipsters in tune with MySpace, its like getting a letter from your parents in your comments section telling you how adorable you are even though you're constantly on the verge of killing yourself in your effort to be as street as Jared Leto.

Even if they were to somehow garner a small fraction of the 160,000 friends Obama had before, knowing that they didn't want the MySpace generation, who they appear to be appealing to, in charge of MySpace operations, preferring a stuffed-suit campaign worker, has to be pretty disheartening to the grassroots. So much for taking initiative on the part of a grateful candidate. MySpace prides itself on the impact that its been able to have with the "youth"--enough to host online discussions about the State of the Union, a mock Presidential campaign, or even enough to be a first destination for every candidate on the ballot in the primaries--and its user-driven content has millions of viewers, at least enough to entice big-money advertisers. Its having an impact, and on both parties--the kind of impact MTV's Choose or Lose campaigns only dreamed of, and all created and managed by a handful of crazed people dying to work for free, and who would have continued working for free for Obama, had he only left them alone.

Granted, Obama is camera-shy on digital media in his name, but for any candidate were generating the kind of internet buzz and creativity as he is (at least for now), the trick is to harness that power and encourage it, not beat someone into submission--especially someone with that much access to millions of potential primary voters.

Zanotti has many great points. But it is interesting to see how fast the Obama campaign is regaining friends for the new and official site. The site has already attracted, 58,706 friends according to TechPresident’s ‘MySpace-friends’ barometer. That means that only Hilary is topping the Obama campaign so far with 63,477 MySpace friends. It will be interesting to see how fast, if at all, the Obama site can break 100,000 again.

-Espen

The Age About Citizen Journalism: Not a Real Alternative

This morning I came across a piece in the Age titled DIY journalism is not a real alternative. The point its author is trying to bring across is:

Just as having Photoshop installed on your computer doesn't make you a graphic designer, setting up a blog doesn't make you a journalist — much less a news organisation. Quality journalism requires enormous amounts of skill and money. Expecting the same depth of reporting by committed amateurs is fanciful.

Fair enough - Citizen journalism might have its issues (check the Jill Leovy part). But I think what the author overlooks is the fact that this form of journalism isn’t about a single author but a whole sphere of blogs and other means of publication that, due to the expertise of all its contributors, can paint an extensive picture of events and give broad background information. Maybe even more so than the commercial press (particularly in Australia where one man, Rupert Murdoch, controls the supply of paper used for newspapers). But then again: What else is the writer supposed to do besides defending his profession against the ever growing competition?

-Jens

Housekeeping and Strikethroughs

-As you may or may not know, BlogCampaigning is a group blog, written by myself (posting as Parkernow), Jens (posting as Schredd), and Espen (posting as Blomqist). As the only native speaker of English on the team, it's my job to edit some of the bizarre grammatical errors that the others use (I guess you can't expect much else from two guys that look like this ;) ). Due to the fact that we live in incredibly different time zones, I don't always have a chance to edit their stuff before they post it, and will instead do it afterwards, using the wordpress edit post feature. While I know that other bloggers will strike through their original material for transparency's sake, I have avoided doing this. Any thoughts on that? -I've only recently noticed that on bigger screens, our page looks kind of crummy. The city image that I've been using as a background (it's a picture I took of Tokyo a few years ago) looks sweet on my little Dell laptop, but on anything larger it only covers half the screen, leaving some ugly bluish-purple boxes below it. Has anyone else noticed this problem? Or the problem that sometimes, our sidebar full of wonderful widgets only shows up once you scroll down about six posts?

Hopefully, I'll get that sorted out.

-In other news, I'm finding that I have a lot more time to post on this site than I previously thought. We've put up some sort of disclosure page (after getting the idea from Chris Clarke's blog...thanks), but I'm still going to try and avoid blogging about anything directly related to my company. Perhaps Connie has some advice for me (us all) about the legal issues of it all?

YouTube Will Improve Politics

That's right, at least according to Steve Grove, YouTube’s political editor. Grove has posted an excellent video explaining how politicians can use YouTube to connect to the people and visa versa. The video contains several short clips showing how politicians and random users have used the medium for political purposes. It is a must-see video showing how YouTube can, and all ready has, changed politics. View the video here, now:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Tvju0Nmja8]

(Subscribers click here)

(via TechPresident)

-Espen

A Voice of Reason

I recently e-mailed a friend of mine about the story of a student not being allowed to graduate because of a photo that she had posted to her MySpace page. My friend Tim, voice of reason that he often is, had this to say about it:

I can’t believe that broad wasn’t allowed to graduate because someone called her a drunk pirate on MySpace. If that’s how real life worked, nobody we know would have ever graduated from college. Think about how many people put in performances worthy of much worse labels than ‘drunken pirate’. What a joke. Cyber-bullying is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard of….talking shit on the internet is something everyone needs to get used to. I’m so sick of people getting rattled by the absolute dumbest things, like anything that happens on Facebook or Myspace. Anything that happens on a site like that has pretty much no bearing on the world in any way, shape, or form. I mean, we could just make up a profile for someone and they’d never even know and we could talk shit all day about stuff that we have no idea about…I can’t believe anyone takes anything seriously that they found on Facebook, let alone MySPACE!! When was the last time you saw a fact on a site like that? I just can’t believe anyone cares. They should have kept Facebook as a site for college-kid assholes and college-kid asshole alumni. Now that people’s parents are on it, it’s turned stupid and no fun and now you have to worry about not graduating from school because of some picture of a drunken pirate on MySpace? Fuck that.

He makes some incredibly valid points: Learning to take shit from people (whether its on the internet or in reality) is something we all need to learn, hanging out where people's parents hang out is never fun, and software that facilitates someone getting fired for partying shouldn't be the next big thing.

-Parker

How much effort are the Democratic candidates putting into blogger outreach?

Jerome Armstrong of Mydd did a review of the effort the 2008 Democratic candidates are putting into outreach toward the netroots last week. He finds that their effort varies and concludes that it's almost as if the candidate websites are afraid of associating with the netroots too closely. Surprisingly, Obama seems to be the candidate that is doing the least to reach out to Democratic-leaning blogs. Armstrong also writes that he has been following the French elections a bit, and that he is impressed with the amount of outreach being done by the Royal campaign. While Royal's outreach might be impressive, Armstrong does not speak French. Neither do I, so no further comment on that issue for now. (Via TechPresident)

Tips for blog outreach can be located in the Beltway blog (just click the link).

-Espen

Dangerous84 to Tony Blair

How good have politics become when Tony Blair takes questions from someone calling himself/herself Dangerous44?

That’s pretty awesome if you ask me. And that’s exactly what you will experience if you pay Labour’s YouTube space, Labourvision a visit today. Tony Blair has now published his response to the comments and videos he received after asking the world to contact him via YouTube earlier this month (refresh your memory here).

The quality of the videos is pretty good. They are not too heavily edited, the production is simple and Blair actually appears quite honest. It actually appears as if he is answering the questions on the spot. This is an excellent way for politicians to get their message and policies across. In fact the concept is also very helpful for voters interested in learning more about parties and their policies on different issues. Screw old boring websites. This is how you interact with voters online.

We will definitely see more of this from more politicians in the future. I am totally convinced of it!

Hilary: A Natural Born Blogger

Hilary Clinton chose to do her first guest blog post this week on FireDogLake, home of Jane Hamsher, producer of the 1994 cult classic film "Natural Born Killers". And if we are to believe the Washington post’s Mary Ann Akers, Hilary is not at all a natural born blogger. Why? Not because she is a bad writer, but because of the blog she chose to engage with.  

I will tell you why Mary Ann Akers says this. But first I just want to say: This was going to be said no matter what blog Hilary chose to post her writings on. It’s a story about politics, tactics and mudslinging. 

So, over to the why…  

Hamsher was supporting Lamont in the 2006 race. She posted a doctored photo of Lieberman in black face on HuffingtonPost.com (read The Washington Post's coverage here). Hamsher ended up apologizing and removed the photo. Hence the “controversy”!

What happened after Clinton posted her piece on FDL was according to Mary Ann Akers that Democratic activists in various corners privately questioned the wisdom of the Clinton campaign in choosing to write for a blog associated with Hamsher  

"It's potentially problematic," said one Hillary backer, who asked for anonymity to speak freely about the issue. "The topic [equal pay for women] is OK, but you have to wonder why she picked firedoglake.com?", reports the Post.

And guess what, a former Lieberman strategist, Dan Gerstein also told the Post that:

Clinton could have chosen a blogger with "less baggage,".

"Just as pure strategy, why would you want to take a risk and invite scorn and controversy and an accusation of hypocrisy when you don't have to?"

Stop, stop, stop… what the …

How controversial is this incident really?

Clinton campaign spokesman Phil Singer told the Post that Hamsher's blog was picked because:  

"there are 100,000 people who frequent this site and we wanted to have a conversation with them."

He also said the decision rested solely on the demographics on a day that made sense: "It's the top [liberal] blog run by women, and it was Equal Pay Day."

Commenting on the Ann Mary Akers piece several respondent pointed out that:

Hillary is reaching out to the left wing blogs because she knows that her support there is weak and that doing so will do her more good than harm.

She's wisely establishing netroots connections.

The only thing the Post article tells us is that this is probably not the last time a politician will be slammed for her/his choice of blog to do a guest post on. Personally I am a bit impressed with Clinton - She even took the time to reply to several of the questions left on her piece. Not that I think Hilary had anything to do with the choice of blog in the first place.

Light Threats (thanks, Tod!)

I would like to take a belated minute to thank Tod Maffin for responding to this post of mine from a week or so ago.In it, I wasn't very clear about why people read less efficiently when looking at a monitor or television screen compared to a projection screen or newspaper. Tod was kind enough to post a response that I will now repost, in case anyone missed the comments:

It’s from a great book called The Skin of Culture. Here’s a review

Basically, when light is beamed right at our eyes, like from a TV set or computer monitor, our nervous system interprets that as a threat, and it’s exhausting, subconciously, but physiologically. Fascinating read.

Thanks for coming to my session!

No, thank you, Tod.

Changes...

As you may have noticed, BlogCampaigning is looking a little bit different these days. That's because we are going to be changing the style, but its too nice of a Sunday afternoon here in Toronto for me to spend time wrangling with CSS. I'll finish the redesign and await the glowing reviews later. In the mean time, entertain yourselves with our new domain name: Blogcampaigning.com. I think that the old blogcampaigning.wordpress.com still works, but I'm not really sure.

Update: Yes, Parker, the old one still works.

Good for Democracy?

Politicians fall behind in online race, reported Reuters last week. Personally I like ZDNet’s headline, reporting on Reuter’s story, better: Politicians struggle to make Net impact. Makes it sound more dramatic!

Anyways, the theme in the article is as usual: Politicians are trying to make use of social networking tools for electioneering purposes – they fail to do it properly – they need to move more towards interactivity and user generated content – the same stuff we always hear.

Then director of e-Democracy at the Hansard Society, a charity that promotes democracy, says:

“Despite teething troubles, advances in digital television, mobile phones and the Internet will "pump the lifeblood" of politics. There is no reason why politicians, parliaments and governments should resist technology. It will make them better connected, it will make them more accountable, it will make the process more transparent.”

“Perhaps you might begin to see turnouts at elections rise”

And that’s an interesting point we want to know more about and look into. I guess it’s still too early to tell yet, but I am also looking into it. If anyone has any statistics, please let us know.

PS: you are not just a celebrity Parker, you are my personal hero! Awesome interview.

Update: Also, check out this article, Blogs brought a new dimension to election, discussing the impact of blogs on the recent Kansas City election.

Me, a celebrity?

I certainly like to think so, and I'm hoping that my recent interview with Leesa Barnes at the networking mixer for the upcoming mesh conference here in Toronto will put me right on the A-list. Listen to the interview, and hear talk about surfing, networking, and a few unfortunate comments about Australia that don't apply to this guy. If nothing else, the whole thing inspired us here at BlogCampaigning to start thinking about doing our own weekly podcast.

What do you, our readers, think? Do you have any interest in hearing a Canadian, a German, and a Norwegian have a ten-minute, intercontinental conversation about social media, public relations, political campaigns, video games, cool tech, post-now theory, and anything else that we fancy?

Keep reading BlogCampaigning, because we've got big changes ahead!

Lots of interesting stuff to report today

So I will break it into short paragraphs and inform you briefly. What you further want to explore is up to you. Her are my favorites:

TechPresident have done further research on Romney’s appearance in YouTube and points us to TubeMogull, which reports that the video has been a big success: "looking at Mitt’s own YouTube views, it almost looks as if he wasn’t online prior to that video – he went from about 3K views a day to 125K on 4/13!".

TechPresident also reports that a newly released study have found that “presidential candidates who have the ‘most comprehensive and innovative websites have also raised the most money: "The purpose of the study is to target the candidates' use of the web, and how it correlates to fundraising. Williams and Gulati are looking for specific innovations like blogging, RSS feeds, use of social networks, email, and splash pages (?) on each site to help them assess the site’s interactive and creative value", reports TechPresident. View the results here.

Todd Zeigler of the Bivings Report joins the discussion about who is doing best online - Dem vs. Rep? And he does have some very useful opinions!

Now my arms hurt from pounding on the keyboard all day long. I am of for a cold beer in the hot Australian sun! Enjoy the weekend!